The State Board of Education approved one health textbook for middle school teachers to use to teach sex education in Texas but rejected any sex-ed materials for elementary school students.
The state has new curriculum requirements, approved last year, that students learn about birth control in addition to sexual abstinence. But the board had to consider which teaching materials to use. The book approved for use in Texas middle schools is one from publisher Goodheart-Willcox.
Although an elementary school health textbook from QuaverEd had received preliminarily approval from the board earlier in the week, it failed to win final approval on Friday. Ït’s disappointing because we wanted to get QuaverEd in for elementary school kids,” said board member Rebecca Bell-Metereau, D-San Marcos
When the board adopted new curriculum standards last year about sex education it was the first such change in Texas in 23 years.
Also earlier this week, board member Will Hickman, R-Houston, voiced opposition to another publisher’s materials, the ones presented by Human Kinetics materials, saying they were “not suitable for grade level” without citing specific objections. But the Houston Republican voted for the QuaverEd and Goodheart-Willcox materials, calling them “good” but “not perfect.”
“I don’t think we should have a vacuum where we adopt nothing,” Hickman said. “It’s just providing an option.”
Many people testifying about the proposed materials opposed discussions of masturbation, inclusion of resources for abortion and affirmations of gender identity and sexual orientation. Such issues, many argued, should be left up to parents for discussion in the home.
Jacqulyn Dudasko, the director of education and policy at anti-abortion organization Texans for Life, noted earlier this week, that Texas law requires schools teaching sex ed to emphasize sexual abstinence. With that in mind, Dudasko urged the board to adopt only the materials from Goodheart-Willcox and QuaverEd, the only two she said “came close” to fitting the state’s statutory requirements.
“There’s a lot of content in some of these texts, and particularly this one, that goes beyond the standards we adopted,” said board member Tom Maynard, R-Florence, referring to the Human Kinetics materials. “We intentionally left off that, because that is intended to be handled separately from health education.”
While many speakers pushed for “parental choice” in opposing the materials, others criticized a potential board vote that would avoid arming students with factual information. Those speakers argued that a lack of such information in schools complicated — and even stigmatized — students’ navigation of life experiences like menstrual health and understanding their own sexuality.
Eliza Epstein said that “students deserve to know the truth.” The self-described education policy specialist said that denying knowledge is poor educational practice.
“You truly have to think about all Texas children that are in Texas public schools,” Epstein said.
The vote comes amid heated debates in Texas and around the country over how public school students learn about topics like sex, sexuality, gender identity and race. This summer, Gov. Greg Abbott signed a bill banning what Republicans often misrepresent as critical race theory in an attempt to limit Texas teachers’ ability to teach about current events and racism.
In October, State Rep. Matt Krause, a candidate for state attorney general, asked school superintendents to confirm whether their campuses have any books on his list of about 850 titles relating to race or sexuality. And Abbott this month pressured the Texas Association of School Boards to determine whether “pornography or other inappropriate content” exists in public schools and remove any such content.